Difference between revisions of "Lossless"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
(== is normal header, = is not reccomended by mediawiki devs. also link is possibly spammy but i'll leave it)
m (Popular lossless formats: added TAK)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
* [[Shorten]] ([[SHN]])
 
* [[Shorten]] ([[SHN]])
 +
 +
* [[TAK]]
  
 
* [[TTA]]
 
* [[TTA]]
Line 32: Line 34:
  
 
* [[WMA | WMA lossless]]
 
* [[WMA | WMA lossless]]
 
  
 
==Oddball Formats==
 
==Oddball Formats==

Revision as of 17:31, 25 May 2007

Lossless compression is a compression methodology in which the result of the compression can be restored faithfully, i.e. bit-by-bit identical with the uncompressed data.

In a nutshell, it is somewhat like compressing a Waveform file with ZIP or RAR.

The difference between 'mere' ZIP/RAR is that lossless compression algorithms are especially tuned and designed for the characteristics of Waveform data, thus achieving compression far greater than can be achieved by generic compression utilities.

As lossless compression preserves all information of the original Waveform file, audio compressed with lossless compression will unavoidably be larger than audio compressed with lossy compression. However, this disadvantage is more than offset by lossless' ability to be transcoded to other lossless format without any quality degradation.


Popular lossless formats

Oddball Formats

There are several old lossless formats that aren't really deserving of having an article all for themselves. Reasons are: lack of widespread support, lack of features, bad efficiency and, most importantly, it seems noone is really interested in them.

Most of those would have disappeared by now, but they are being preserved for posterity at rjamorim's ReallyRareWares

Advanced Digital Audio (ADA)
Marian's a-Pac
AudioZip
Dakx WAV
Entis Lab MIO
LiteWave
Pegasus SPS
RKaudio
Split2000
Sonarc
VocPack
WavArc
WaveZip/MUSICompress


Note that currently no single format can be considered best for all applications. Rather, the best format depends on the intended use, as well as a number of other factors (such as licensing and file structure). For example, Shorten and FLAC are widely used for sharing live music because of their cross-platform support and speed. Monkey's Audio is popular among Windows users for its superior compression ratio.

Comparisons

Note the specific assumptions and limitations of each comparison; in particular, results are sensitive to the music selected'

http://web.inter.nl.net/users/hvdh/lossless/lossless.htm 
Includes an interesting graph of encode/decode speeds vs. file size on the All Albums page
Lossless comparison 
A comparision focusing more on codec features and less on absolute encoding efficiency. Also features a table comparing most popular codecs based on their features.
http://members.home.nl/w.speek/comparison.htm 
Performance Comparison of Lossless Audio Compressors - Compares file size, encode speed, decode speed for APE, FLAC, LPAC, WavPack, Shorten (SHN), RKAU, OptimFROG, LA, WMA Lossless. Updated 5-2003
http://www.bobulous.org.uk/misc/lossless_audio_2006.html 
Lossless audio formats - A comparison of the rip-and-encode speed and album file size of six different lossless formats: uncompressed Wave, FLAC, WavPack, Shorten, Monkey's Audio, and OptimFROG. First published on 22nd May 2006.

External Links