Gapless playback

Gapless playback is the seamless playback of sequential audio tracks in digital audio formats. It allows live music or consecutive tracks to be heard exactly as they are mastered, without gaps between tracks.

Example

The typical situation is this:

1. Someone uses DAE software to extract audio data from an audio CD and save it to separate files, one for each track.
2. During or after the creation of the files, the audio data is compressed with a codec like MP3.
3. Upon playback, a click or a brief (fraction-of-a-second) pause can be heard between tracks.

Why gaps occur

There are two main reasons why gaps occur during playback.

Compression scheme artifacts

Most lossy audio compression schemes add a small amount of silence to the beginning of a track. One reason that this happens is because many such schemes involve a time/frequency domain transform (such as an MDCT) which can introduce gaps called encoder delay. These gaps can be enlarged at decode time when a reverse-MDCT is performed, because the reverse transform will also introduce gaps (decoder delay) of its own. Another factor is the fact that transforms act on data in units of fixed-size blocks. In order for the audio signal to be encoded in its entirety, small amounts of silence are appended to the input before the transform. If the amount of padded silence is not accounted for, the padding will be decoded together with the audio data, also introducing gaps between tracks. Due to the introduction of such gaps, the playtime of the audio data is often slightly increased. (See LAME Technical FAQ)

This issue is technical but also standards-related. The popular MP3 standard, for example, defines no way to record the amount of delay or padding for later removal. Also, the encoder delay may vary from encoder to encoder, making automatic removal difficult. (See lame v3.81 and 3.87 beta mp3 decoding quality test results for a table of encoder delay values.) Even if two tracks are decompressed and merged into a single track, a gap will usually remain between them. More recent compressed audio formats have been designed to address this problem, and can therefore produce gapless audio if played back correctly.

Poor design

Even when the audio file itself does not contain undesirable gaps, software/firmware/hardware design often adds gaps during playback. In some cases, software closes and re-opens the output stream when switching tracks, causing the hardware to create a very short "click". This problem is solved in more sophisticated designs of gapless playback.

A different design problem relates to software/firmware/hardware which are not ready to seamlessly move to the next track by the time the current track is complete. In this scenario, the listener is left waiting in silence as the player locates the next file, reads it, decodes the first blocks if necessary and then starts loading the buffer for playback. The gap can be as much as half a second, or even more — very noticeable in "continuous" music such as certain classical or dance genres.

Many older audio players on personal computers do not implement the required buffering to play gapless audio. Some of these rely on third-party gapless audio plug-ins to buffer output. Some newer players and newer versions of old players now support gapless playback directly.

CD gaps

Gapless playback, as discussed here, is not related to "gaps" or "pregaps" on CDs, at least not directly. Those kinds of gaps are just sections of audio which have been designated on the CD as being the "index 00" portion of each track. They are the audio (often silent or nearly so, but not always) which plays while the CD player counts up from a negative time to 0:00. Some DAE software offers the option of detecting and omitting these sections when ripping. Although this may seem to be a method of creating "gapless" audio, it's merely removing, with only 588-sample (1/75th of a second) precision, chunks of sound based on flags embedded in the CD, not based on how silent the audio actually is. This kind of feature is useful when ripping a CD-R which had been mistakenly burned with 2-second gaps between each track, but when used on a properly mastered commercial CD, it's more likely to just create audible seams where there were none before.

Testing for gapless

The best way to test for gapless playback is by using Test Samples listed at the end of this page.

Some people attempts to detect gapless by generating pure tones, and encoding them into a lossy format. This is not recommended for two reasons:

1. Unless the first tone ends at 0 level and the second tone starts at 0 level, a glitch will be heard during transition. 2. Some decoders chop off the end and/or the start of the audio data. So the playback will be perceived as gapless, while it is actually not.

See the discussion on this HA thread.

Optimal solution

It is possible to store metadata in the audio to explicitly declare the playtime, and/or the amount of padding/delays introduced in the encoding process. This information can be used to ensure that playtime will remain constant after decoding with no added silence. The audio playback software must be able to recognize the metadata, and trim the decoded audio as necessary.

The software can then take care to keep the output stream open between tracks. It must also buffer the beginning of the following track in the same way it buffers the current track during normal playback.

If the compression method supports gapless playback, the software properly decodes the audio data and metadata, the next track is buffered and ready to play, and the output stream remains open between tracks, optimal gapless audio is achieved. A collection of consecutive tracks will then play in the same way they were mastered, allowing the listener to hear their album as the author intended.

Alternative solutions

Digital signal processor (DSP) plugins can be used to detect silence between tracks and trim the audio as necessary on playback. This is not an optimal solution because it does not always produce results identical to the source. Sometimes an artist may intentionally leave silence at track boundaries for dramatic effect; removing this silence also removes that effect.

It can also be difficult to properly implement silence removal. If the silence threshold is too low and the track contains decoder artifacts, the software may not recognise some silences. Conversely, if the threshold is too high, the software may remove entire sections of quiet music at the beginning or end of a track.

DSP plugins can also be used to cross-fade between tracks. This eliminates gaps that some listeners find distracting, but also greatly alters the audio data and is not always desirable. In particular, when tracks are meant to be played together and perform the transition at high volume, cross-fading results in a large volume drop.

Both of these alternate solutions are typically used to address compression methods that do not support the metadata for gapless playback. Like the optimal solution, they still require buffering and not closing the output stream; however, they require more computations, making them less efficient. In portable digital audio players, this can mean a reduced playing time on batteries.

Due to the drawbacks of the alternative solutions above, some listeners dislike their negative effects more than the gap they attempt to remove. Another problem is that the solutions above do nothing to prevent the output stream from being closed and reopened at track boundaries; some measures can be taken to simulate a gapless output stream, but they are not always successful and side-effects may occur.

Another alternative is to ignore track boundaries, encoding a single collection of tracks as a single compressed file, relying on cuesheets (or something similar) for navigation. While this method results in gapless playback within the collection of tracks with consecutive playback, it can be unwieldy due to the possibly large size of the resulting compressed file. Furthermore, unless the playback software or hardware can recognize the cue sheets, navigating between tracks may be difficult.

Format support

Since lossless data compression excludes the possibility of the introduction of padding, all lossless audio file formats are inherently gapless. The following lossy audio file formats have provisions for gapless encoding.

• (Ogg) Vorbis
• Speex

Some other formats do not officially support gapless encoding, but some implementations of encoders or decoders may handle gapless metadata.

• LAME-encoded MP3 can be gapless with players that support the LAME Mp3 info tag.
• AAC in MP4 encoded with Nero Digital from Nero AG can be gapless with foobar2000.
• AAC in MP4 encoded with iTunes 7.0 can be gapless with iTunes 7.0 and latest foobar2000.

Gapless solutions

• foobar2000: Optimal gapless playback
• Otachan's in_!mpg123: A gapless MP3 decoder for Winamp

Note: Winamp 5.2 implements gapless playback in its built-in MP3 decoder.

Test samples

• [1]: 17 very short gapless samples (2 MB)