Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase:Deletion requests/Open source: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:32, 7 December 2006

Open source

To vote, use this code: * '''YOUR VOTE''' Reason for vote ~~~~
Info like this belongs in wikipedia, IMO. --pepoluan (talk | contribs) 03:22, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

Maybe it's linked to on open source encoder pages, etc? Maybe not. Delete. (sbirtnoc | klat) elibomttoillE 08:58, 21 September 2006 (CDT)

Scratch that, keep. Ell io tt mob ilehttp://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/images/c/c1/Fishysig.PNG 13:42, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? Jan 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

keep I agree with Jan, besides, it's better to have a quick summary of what's Open Source, rather than the insanely huge article at Wikipedia rjamorim 12:32, 7 December 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 18:48, 22 September 2006 (view source) Jan (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 18:32, 7 December 2006 (view source) Rjamorim (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? [[User:Jan\|Jan]] 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT)		Well, since a lot of pages mention that some software is open source isn't it prudent to have a page that explains what that means? [[User:Jan\|Jan]] 13:48, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

			* '''keep''' I agree with Jan, besides, it's better to have a quick summary of what's Open Source, rather than the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source insanely huge] article at Wikipedia [[User:Rjamorim\|rjamorim]] 12:32, 7 December 2006 (CST)