Difference between revisions of "User talk:Canar"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Removing comments from your talk page)
(Removing comments from your talk page)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
== Removing comments from your talk page ==
 
== Removing comments from your talk page ==
  
At Wikipedia, it's considered bad manners to remove other people's comments from your talk page. If you want, you can move your talk page to a subpage. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 13:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
+
Hi, at Wikipedia, it's considered bad manners to remove other people's comments from your talk page. If you want, you can move your talk page to a subpage and create a new talk page. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 13:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
 +
:Edited. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 13:28, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:28, 26 September 2006

No more issue. Baleeted. Thanks, Jan. -- Canar 15:27, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

Please refrain from re-adding the talkheader template to this page. -- Canar 17:20, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

In response to you:

"There was no reason for you to interfere with the templates on my talk page or the name of the article I am working on that I linked to on my user page. Kindly sod off."

First, talkheader is required to go at the start of all pages. It just does. And I didn't change any article name. In regards to "Kindy sod off," would I be right in thinking that's a personal attack? You obviously canot reason beyond flames thus I will terminate this discussion now. ElliottmobileFishysig.PNG 02:16, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

Oh, you meant your incorrect userpage. It means "user page fro a user named Canar:Titl..., not Subpage of Canar's userpage called Titl...". I really don't see how your decisions can override mediawiki conventions. ElliottmobileFishysig.PNG 02:22, 25 September 2006 (CDT)

Your talk page has none. Many users' talk pages have none. Why is mine special? And why do mediawiki "conventions" override a user's wishes? The point of software is to be usable. My user page is quasi-public. I have it there because it's easy for me, and I should be the one whose judgement is used in what goes and what doesn't go on my user page (within obvious reason). As it is, my user page actually has something resembling content, which is more than can be said about yours. As for the "sod off", I was frustrated by your actions. Perhaps it was not required, but you're being a hypocrite about the talkheader. Anyhow, I've wasted enough time on you. Go away. Leave me alone. kthxbye -- Canar 21:59, 25 September 2006 (CDT)
My talk page has none because nobody has thought to add one yet. Remember, anyone can change anything, and that includes your wishes. It is not "your document" at all. And, the software defines Something/page as a subpage and properly handles it. On that note...

@@@ This is a header @@@

  • This is bold*. The formatting is my wishes and you shall not change it. ElliottmobileFishysig.PNG 03:09, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Removing comments from your talk page

Hi, at Wikipedia, it's considered bad manners to remove other people's comments from your talk page. If you want, you can move your talk page to a subpage and create a new talk page. --Kjoonlee 13:25, 26 September 2006 (CDT)

Edited. --Kjoonlee 13:28, 26 September 2006 (CDT)