Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vorbis"
From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | I don't see any purpose rehashing this whole legal thing again. If peoeple are interested in the discussion they should just read the thread. | + | I don't see any purpose rehashing this whole legal thing again. If peoeple are interested in the discussion they should just read the thread. 17 June 2005 (EST) |
: Well, I lifted that text directly from Wikipedia, and I thought it to be very interesting, as it clarifies the situation while doing caveats that everything could be just FUD from the competitors. rjamorim 00:55, 19 Jun 2005 (CDT) | : Well, I lifted that text directly from Wikipedia, and I thought it to be very interesting, as it clarifies the situation while doing caveats that everything could be just FUD from the competitors. rjamorim 00:55, 19 Jun 2005 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Yeah that's true, I understand were you are coming from. Wikipedia just has it their reguarding the liscense and the whole issues is up in the air. 12:12, 20 Jun 2005 (EST) |
Revision as of 04:11, 20 June 2005
I don't see any purpose rehashing this whole legal thing again. If peoeple are interested in the discussion they should just read the thread. 17 June 2005 (EST)
- Well, I lifted that text directly from Wikipedia, and I thought it to be very interesting, as it clarifies the situation while doing caveats that everything could be just FUD from the competitors. rjamorim 00:55, 19 Jun 2005 (CDT)
Yeah that's true, I understand were you are coming from. Wikipedia just has it their reguarding the liscense and the whole issues is up in the air. 12:12, 20 Jun 2005 (EST)