Difference between revisions of "Talk:Recommended LAME"
From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article is redundant information. It seems to be only a copy of [[LAME#Recommended Encoder Settings|LAME]]. Why is that? --Pohli 11:54, 29 July 2006 (CDT) | This article is redundant information. It seems to be only a copy of [[LAME#Recommended Encoder Settings|LAME]]. Why is that? --Pohli 11:54, 29 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
| − | + | :Thank the fools that don't bother to search the wiki before writing guides ;-D. I made an attempt to fix it on the main page so that it just pointed to LAME page. I know it would make sense though to have a recommended lame page and keep everything on there? I usually don't use LAME to much so I leave it up to them. --[[HotshotGG]] 1:33, 29 July 2006 (CDT) | |
| − | Thank the fools that don't bother to search the wiki before writing guides ;-D. I made an attempt to fix it on the main page so that it just pointed to LAME page. I know it would make sense though to have a recommended lame page and keep everything on there? I usually don't use LAME to much so I leave it up to them. --[[HotshotGG]] 1:33, 29 July 2006 (CDT) | + | ::I don't think we need a whole extra "Recommended LAME" page if there's no new information. An advice on the ordinary LAME page should be enough and we have the [[Lame Compiles]] page, too. --Pohli 03:42, 30 July 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 08:42, 30 July 2006
This article is redundant information. It seems to be only a copy of LAME. Why is that? --Pohli 11:54, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Thank the fools that don't bother to search the wiki before writing guides ;-D. I made an attempt to fix it on the main page so that it just pointed to LAME page. I know it would make sense though to have a recommended lame page and keep everything on there? I usually don't use LAME to much so I leave it up to them. --HotshotGG 1:33, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- I don't think we need a whole extra "Recommended LAME" page if there's no new information. An advice on the ordinary LAME page should be enough and we have the Lame Compiles page, too. --Pohli 03:42, 30 July 2006 (CDT)
