Difference between revisions of "Lossless Audio"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(added link to Rjamorim's lossless comparison)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Pros==
 
==Pros==
 
 
* Compresses files better than any other current lossless encoder
 
* Compresses files better than any other current lossless encoder
 
* Available for Windows (win32) and Linux/x86 (binaries only).
 
* Available for Windows (win32) and Linux/x86 (binaries only).
Line 6: Line 5:
  
 
==Cons==
 
==Cons==
 
 
* Very slow encode and decode (realtime on 700-800mhz CPU)
 
* Very slow encode and decode (realtime on 700-800mhz CPU)
 
* No source code or format specification available.
 
* No source code or format specification available.
  
[http://www.lossless-audio.com/ Lossless Audio website]
+
 
 +
==Addtional Reading==
 +
* [http://www.lossless-audio.com/ Lossless Audio website]
 +
* [[Lossless_comparision|Lossless Codec Comparison]] by Rjamorim

Revision as of 11:00, 12 April 2005

Pros

  • Compresses files better than any other current lossless encoder
  • Available for Windows (win32) and Linux/x86 (binaries only).
  • xmms + WinAMP plugin available

Cons

  • Very slow encode and decode (realtime on 700-800mhz CPU)
  • No source code or format specification available.


Addtional Reading