Difference between revisions of "Huffman coding"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Additional reading:)
m (... I think we should just call the bottom references instead)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
text © Gabriel Bouvigne - www.mp3-tech.org
 
text © Gabriel Bouvigne - www.mp3-tech.org
  
==Additional reading:==  
+
==References==  
 
* [http://compression.ru/download/articles/huff/huffman_1952_minimum-redundancy-codes.pdf Huffman Original Research Paper from 1952] on entropy coding.   
 
* [http://compression.ru/download/articles/huff/huffman_1952_minimum-redundancy-codes.pdf Huffman Original Research Paper from 1952] on entropy coding.   
 
* [http://bcl.sourceforge.net/ Huffman source code] an ANSI C implementation of the algorithm.  
 
* [http://bcl.sourceforge.net/ Huffman source code] an ANSI C implementation of the algorithm.  
 
* [http://alexvn.freeservers.com/s1/huffman_template_algorithm.html#label_Algorithm n-ary Huffman Template algorithm] written in C++ (GPL license).
 
* [http://alexvn.freeservers.com/s1/huffman_template_algorithm.html#label_Algorithm n-ary Huffman Template algorithm] written in C++ (GPL license).

Revision as of 06:09, 2 September 2006

Most lossy audio encoders (MP3, Vorbis, AAC) use a common algorithmic technique, known as Huffman coding. This is not a compression algorithm, but rather a coding method, known as (entropy coding). This coding creates variable length codes on a whole number of bits. Higher probability symbols have shorter codes. Huffman codes have the property to have a unique prefix, they can therefore be decoded correctly in spite of their variable length. The decoding step is very fast (via a correspondence table). This kind of coding allows to save on the average a bit less than 20% of space.

It is an ideal complement of the perceptual coding: During big polyphonies, the perceptual coding is very efficient, due to the fact that many sounds are masked or lessened, but little information is identical, so the Huffman algorithm is very seldomly efficient. During "pure" sounds there are few masking effects, but Huffman is then very efficient because digitalized sound contains many repetitive bytes. These bytes will later be replaced by shorter codes.

text © Gabriel Bouvigne - www.mp3-tech.org

References