Difference between revisions of "Foobar2000 Talk:Components"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
(took out old conversation)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Someone know if there is a way to set image as a link to another page inside the wiki server?
+
{{talkheader}}
  
Things like that doesn't work: <nowiki>([[Foobar2000:0.9 ATSurround Processor (foo_dsp_atsurround)|Image:Example.jpg]])</nowiki>
+
==Page Discussion==
  
--[[User:Eejadx|Eejadx]] 19:47, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
+
The formatting of this page rather sucks; shouldn't the first link connect to a wikipage here, then from that wikipage links to the external page?
 +
That would solve the problem of adding non-uniform (more info) links... --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 11:49, 6 September 2006 (CDT)
  
I too would also like to know. Also... I've been lazy with my CSS and layouts this year. --[[User:Reglib|Reglib]] 17:57, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
+
I agree. Seemingly you'd want to link primarily to the wiki pages and link to the forums from those pages. --[[User:Wolfsong|Wolfsong]] 16:37, 5 November 2006 (CST)
  
Does the R4 visualization belong in a page listing foobar2000 components? It is most certainly not one, and would probably break if using alternate output methods. -- [[User:Canar|Canar]] 14:30, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
+
There is already a components site available what might render this page useless IMO. There is no new info here, but rather links to external pages only. To me this page is not needed if it is easy enough to search for said components in the official components page.--[[User:Beto|Beto]] <small>'''([[User_talk:Beto|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Beto|contribs]])'''</small> 13:53, 6 November 2006 (CST)
 +
 
 +
What exactly is the difference between Audio Codecs and Other Codecs in the Input section? --[[User:Foosion|foosion]] 07:13, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
 +
:none that I can make sense of... --[[User:Beto|Beto]] <small>'''([[User_talk:Beto|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Beto|contribs]])'''</small> 12:44, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 +
:: I wanted to make a distinction between codecs formally used for music files and the others (console, computer games, etc.) I may not have took the best title, so feel free to edit if you have something more relevant in mind. --[[User:Eejadx|Eejadx]] 23:16, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 +
 
 +
Component lists should use bulets not numbering --[[User:Mix de Rax|Mix de Rax]] 20:01, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 +
Like
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Custom Info (foo_custominfo)|Custom Info (foo_custominfo)]] Allows you to set info fields for files without modifying them.
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Discogs (foo_discogs)|Discogs (foo_discogs)]] Retrieve info and album art from Discogs.com database.
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Freedb Tagger (foo_freedb2)|Freedb Tagger (foo_freedb2)]] Freedb.org tagger.
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Freedb2 Characters Fixer (foo_freedb2_fix)|Freedb2 Characters Fixer (foo_freedb2_fix)]] This plugin fix freedb2 problem - some native characters are broken. This masstagger addon can recovery its. ''Note: russian characters supported only.''
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Live Show Tagger (foo_tradersfriend)|Live Show Tagger (foo_tradersfriend)]] Live show tagger.
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Masstagger (foo_masstag)|Masstagger (foo_masstag)]] Comes with official installer
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Masstagger Addons (foo_masstag_addons)|Masstagger Addons (foo_masstag_addons)]] Some addons for masstagger, including code page conversion and chinese conversion.
 +
* [[Foobar2000:Components 0.9/Special File Info Box (foo_infobox)|Special File Info Box (foo_infobox)]] A replacement of the built-in file info box.
 +
 
 +
=== First party and third party sections ===
 +
 
 +
Would it make sense to divide this section into separate first party and third party sections?
 +
 
 +
Personally I think this would help support-issue wise. Opinions?  Peter, do you care?
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Shakey snake|shakey_snake]] 16:06, 24 June 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 16:37, 27 November 2009

This is the talk page for discussing changes to the Components article.

  • Please do not use it as a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. Use the forums instead.
  • Please read the wiki policy before editing.
  • Sign and date your posts using two dashes and four tildes (--~~~~).
  • Place new comments after existing ones (but within topic sections).
  • Separate topic sections with a ==Descriptive header==.
  • Feel free to use these smilies by embedding their codes:
    Smiley--).png {{smiley|)}} Smiley--D.png {{smiley|D}} Smiley--(.png {{smiley|(}} Smiley--;.png {{smiley|;}}

Page Discussion

The formatting of this page rather sucks; shouldn't the first link connect to a wikipage here, then from that wikipage links to the external page? That would solve the problem of adding non-uniform (more info) links... --pepoluan 11:49, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

I agree. Seemingly you'd want to link primarily to the wiki pages and link to the forums from those pages. --Wolfsong 16:37, 5 November 2006 (CST)

There is already a components site available what might render this page useless IMO. There is no new info here, but rather links to external pages only. To me this page is not needed if it is easy enough to search for said components in the official components page.--Beto (talk | contribs) 13:53, 6 November 2006 (CST)

What exactly is the difference between Audio Codecs and Other Codecs in the Input section? --foosion 07:13, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

none that I can make sense of... --Beto (talk | contribs) 12:44, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
I wanted to make a distinction between codecs formally used for music files and the others (console, computer games, etc.) I may not have took the best title, so feel free to edit if you have something more relevant in mind. --Eejadx 23:16, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Component lists should use bulets not numbering --Mix de Rax 20:01, 20 June 2007 (CDT) Like

First party and third party sections

Would it make sense to divide this section into separate first party and third party sections?

Personally I think this would help support-issue wise. Opinions? Peter, do you care?

--shakey_snake 16:06, 24 June 2008 (CDT)