Talk:Recommended Ogg Vorbis: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Yes, we do need the green text, it add's color to the wiki and sticks with color scheme in the thread ;-D. I personally put the page together with my bare hands, adapted, and changed it. The History should be similiar to, but with less of an emphasis on the codec and more on the binaries. I need to add in the advanced-command line parameters and knowing what binary is which. A lot of the other stuff can be left out. Thanks for fixing the table btw. If you see any other articles you can add information to with a reference or a source feel to free to do so. --[[User:HotshotGG|HotshotGG]] 5:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC). | Yes, we do need the green text, it add's color to the wiki and sticks with color scheme in the thread ;-D. I personally put the page together with my bare hands, adapted, and changed it. The History should be similiar to, but with less of an emphasis on the codec and more on the binaries. I need to add in the advanced-command line parameters and knowing what binary is which. A lot of the other stuff can be left out. Thanks for fixing the table btw. If you see any other articles you can add information to with a reference or a source feel to free to do so. --[[User:HotshotGG|HotshotGG]] 5:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC). | ||
:I'm all for color in the Wiki... but why must green :D | |||
:BTW you are wrong about 4.51. 4.51 is bugfix of 4.5, which is improvement from 4. | |||
:So from 4.5 to 4.51 there's no code change (other than bugfix), but from 4 to 4.5 there's improvement in quality. | |||
:See the announcement [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38517 here]. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 07:48, 6 January 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 13:48, 6 January 2006
Um, the history here. Shouldn't it be in the Ogg Vorbis page instead? And a linkback from the Ogg Vorbis page to this page. --pepoluan 20:22, 4 January 2006 (CST)
I have added linkback from Ogg Vorbis page. Do we need the green text? And can someone tell me if 4.51 has or hasn't became the recommended version? (I personally use 4.51 but no time nor desire to AB 4 and 4.51) --pepoluan 20:44, 4 January 2006 (CST)
Yes, we do need the green text, it add's color to the wiki and sticks with color scheme in the thread ;-D. I personally put the page together with my bare hands, adapted, and changed it. The History should be similiar to, but with less of an emphasis on the codec and more on the binaries. I need to add in the advanced-command line parameters and knowing what binary is which. A lot of the other stuff can be left out. Thanks for fixing the table btw. If you see any other articles you can add information to with a reference or a source feel to free to do so. --HotshotGG 5:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC).
- I'm all for color in the Wiki... but why must green :D
- BTW you are wrong about 4.51. 4.51 is bugfix of 4.5, which is improvement from 4.
- So from 4.5 to 4.51 there's no code change (other than bugfix), but from 4 to 4.5 there's improvement in quality.
- See the announcement here. --pepoluan 07:48, 6 January 2006 (CST)