Talk:MP3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
It might be a good idea to move the technical info down last on the page. I imagine that very few poeple need to read it and it really looks frightening. | It might be a good idea to move the technical info down last on the page. I imagine that very few poeple need to read it and it really looks frightening. | ||
[[User:Jan|Jan]] 04:41, 16 September 2006 (CDT) | [[User:Jan|Jan]] 04:41, 16 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
: Maybe it would be better to put it right before the 'See also' section? What about creating a specific MP3 technical page to put this information? I really don't know what the rule of thumb is on other technical oriented wikis..... Does anyone have any references?--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 16:04, 16 September 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:04, 16 September 2006
Page discussion
is there any summary of a good quality / space compromise for using lame encoder?
The section Technical information needs a lot of work. Apparently there was someone interested in the past in maintaining it.--Beto 15:29, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
This is a whackingly big page File:Biggrin.gif --pepoluan 18:15, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
It might be a good idea to move the technical info down last on the page. I imagine that very few poeple need to read it and it really looks frightening.
Jan 04:41, 16 September 2006 (CDT)
- Maybe it would be better to put it right before the 'See also' section? What about creating a specific MP3 technical page to put this information? I really don't know what the rule of thumb is on other technical oriented wikis..... Does anyone have any references?--Beto 16:04, 16 September 2006 (CDT)