Lossless Audio: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(added link to Rjamorim's lossless comparison) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Pros== | ==Pros== | ||
* Compresses files better than any other current lossless encoder | * Compresses files better than any other current lossless encoder | ||
* Available for Windows (win32) and Linux/x86 (binaries only). | * Available for Windows (win32) and Linux/x86 (binaries only). | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
==Cons== | ==Cons== | ||
* Very slow encode and decode (realtime on 700-800mhz CPU) | * Very slow encode and decode (realtime on 700-800mhz CPU) | ||
* No source code or format specification available. | * No source code or format specification available. | ||
[http://www.lossless-audio.com/ Lossless Audio website] | |||
==Addtional Reading== | |||
* [http://www.lossless-audio.com/ Lossless Audio website] | |||
* [[Lossless_comparision|Lossless Codec Comparison]] by Rjamorim | |||
Revision as of 10:00, 12 April 2005
Pros
- Compresses files better than any other current lossless encoder
- Available for Windows (win32) and Linux/x86 (binaries only).
- xmms + WinAMP plugin available
Cons
- Very slow encode and decode (realtime on 700-800mhz CPU)
- No source code or format specification available.
Addtional Reading
- Lossless Audio website
- Lossless Codec Comparison by Rjamorim