Foobar2000 Talk:Foobar2000: Difference between revisions
Topdownjimmy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
-topdownjimmy | -topdownjimmy | ||
---- | ---- | ||
I just put the code in the 'Basic Color Codes' section into code blocks for ease of reading, but found I had to use IE to do the editing since firefox couldn't handle the block chars in the edit panel. Firefox seems to display them fine though. Is this going to be a problem? Thought I should ask before I tried to do the same for the rest of the page. - krazy | |||
Revision as of 04:18, 15 February 2005
Thanks, krazy, for the link to picmixer's masstagger guide. :) I moved it to the end of the masstagger section because I think it makes more sense there.--Topdownjimmy 22:45, 13 Feb 2005 (CST)
Reversed order of discussion posts (newer at top). Thanks, krazy, for pointing out foo_looks was problematic.
--Topdownjimmy 15:07, 13 Feb 2005 (CST)
Removed references to foo_looks and replaced with foo_ui_gfx. It's just that I don't think a potential troublemaker should be on the wiki page. Other than that, looking good!
Krazy, I moved your "Commonly Used Panel Extensions" down into the Columns UI section of the Beginner's Guide, I hope you don't mind. -topdownjimmy
I just put the code in the 'Basic Color Codes' section into code blocks for ease of reading, but found I had to use IE to do the editing since firefox couldn't handle the block chars in the edit panel. Firefox seems to display them fine though. Is this going to be a problem? Thought I should ask before I tried to do the same for the rest of the page. - krazy