Template talk:Stub: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Usage?: {{stub}} on top or bottom?) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Maybe like the talkheader template; the border is subdued (or none), color is pale-blue-ish, text need not be bold but only italics. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan|contribs]])'''</small> 03:00, 21 September 2006 (CDT) | ::Maybe like the talkheader template; the border is subdued (or none), color is pale-blue-ish, text need not be bold but only italics. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan|contribs]])'''</small> 03:00, 21 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
==Usage?== | |||
Someone in the forums [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=48046&view=findpost&p=428094 here] said that stubs should be located '''on top''' of an article. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] <small>'''([[User_talk:pepoluan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/pepoluan|contribs]])'''</small> 10:41, 22 September 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:41, 22 September 2006
Page Discussion
What happened to the box? I kinda like it... it gives a nice emphasis to the fact that an article is a stub. --pepoluan (talk | contribs) 01:39, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
- Hmm... how else could we emphasise it? A graphic like Wikipedia? I dunno, I just think it makes people look at the big stub notice instead of the article, and then looking at the stub notice (and possibly expanding it.) (sbirtnoc | klat) elibomttoillE 02:57, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
Usage?
Someone in the forums here said that stubs should be located on top of an article. --pepoluan (talk | contribs) 10:41, 22 September 2006 (CDT)