Talk:Recommended LAME: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:55, 31 July 2006

This article is redundant information. It seems to be only a copy of LAME. Why is that? --Pohli 11:54, 29 July 2006 (CDT)

Thank the fools that don't bother to search the wiki before writing guides ;-D. I made an attempt to fix it on the main page so that it just pointed to LAME page. I know it would make sense though to have a recommended lame page and keep everything on there? I usually don't use LAME to much so I leave it up to them. --HotshotGG 1:33, 29 July 2006 (CDT)

I don't think we need a whole extra "Recommended LAME" page if there's no new information. An advice on the ordinary LAME page should be enough and we have the Lame Compiles page, too. --Pohli 03:42, 30 July 2006 (CDT)

The "Recommended LAME" page is loaded inside the LAME page. The LAME page itself does not have this information. Jan 04:55, 31 July 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:55, 31 July 2006 (view source) Jan (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:55, 31 July 2006 (view source) Jan (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The "Recommended LAME" page is loaded inside the LAME page. The LAME page itself does not have this information.		The "Recommended LAME" page is loaded inside the LAME page. The LAME page itself does not have this information.
			[[User:Jan\|Jan]] 04:55, 31 July 2006 (CDT)