Talk:Recommended LAME: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:42, 30 July 2006

This article is redundant information. It seems to be only a copy of LAME. Why is that? --Pohli 11:54, 29 July 2006 (CDT)

Thank the fools that don't bother to search the wiki before writing guides ;-D. I made an attempt to fix it on the main page so that it just pointed to LAME page. I know it would make sense though to have a recommended lame page and keep everything on there? I usually don't use LAME to much so I leave it up to them. --HotshotGG 1:33, 29 July 2006 (CDT)

I don't think we need a whole extra "Recommended LAME" page if there's no new information. An advice on the ordinary LAME page should be enough and we have the Lame Compiles page, too. --Pohli 03:42, 30 July 2006 (CDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This article is redundant information. It seems to be only a copy of [[LAME#Recommended Encoder Settings|LAME]]. Why is that? --Pohli 11:54, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
+:Thank the fools that don't bother to search the wiki before writing guides ;-D. I made an attempt to fix it on the main page so that it just pointed to LAME page. I know it would make sense though to have a recommended lame page and keep everything on there? I usually don't use LAME to much so I leave it up to them. --[[HotshotGG]] 1:33, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
-Thank the fools that don't bother to search the wiki before writing guides ;-D. I made an attempt to fix it on the main page so that it just pointed to LAME page. I know it would make sense though to have a recommended lame page and keep everything on there? I usually don't use LAME to much so I leave it up to them. --[[HotshotGG]] 1:33, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
+::I don't think we need a whole extra "Recommended LAME" page if there's no new information. An advice on the ordinary LAME page should be enough and we have the [[Lame Compiles]] page, too. --Pohli 03:42, 30 July 2006 (CDT)