Talk:Bitrate: Difference between revisions
(possible references) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Also, I'm not sure how technical this article should be. I'm thinking about the blurb about baud rate. I learned it as a symbol rate, but then we'd have to define what a symbol is. Personally I'd just remove it. | Also, I'm not sure how technical this article should be. I'm thinking about the blurb about baud rate. I learned it as a symbol rate, but then we'd have to define what a symbol is. Personally I'd just remove it. | ||
--[[User:Reglib|Reglib]] 20:09, 15 May 2006 (CDT) | --[[User:Reglib|Reglib]] 20:09, 15 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
---- | |||
I don't think that reference to baud is needed. Causes unnecessary confusion. It is of use only to telecom engineers (like me). I'll delete the sentence. | |||
--[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 01:43, 16 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:43, 16 May 2006
I wasn't sure about some of the facts presented in the article so here's some relavent Wikipedia links:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix#Specific_units_of_IEC_60027-2_A.2
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit_rate
Also, I'm not sure how technical this article should be. I'm thinking about the blurb about baud rate. I learned it as a symbol rate, but then we'd have to define what a symbol is. Personally I'd just remove it. --Reglib 20:09, 15 May 2006 (CDT)
I don't think that reference to baud is needed. Causes unnecessary confusion. It is of use only to telecom engineers (like me). I'll delete the sentence. --pepoluan 01:43, 16 May 2006 (CDT)