Talk:MP3: Difference between revisions
(recommended lame encoder settings?) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} | |||
==Page discussion== | |||
is there any summary of a good quality / space compromise | is there any summary of a good quality / space compromise | ||
for using lame encoder? | for using lame encoder? | ||
:yes. it is now included in the [[LAME]] page.--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 15:29, 15 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
The section '''Technical information''' needs a lot of work. Apparently there was someone interested in the past in maintaining it.--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 15:29, 15 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
This is a whackingly big page [[Image:Smiley--D.png]] --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 18:15, 15 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
It might be a good idea to move the technical info down last on the page. I imagine that very few poeple need to read it and it really looks frightening. | |||
[[User:Jan|Jan]] 04:41, 16 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
: Maybe it would be better to put it right before the 'See also' section? What about creating a specific MP3 technical page to put this information? I really don't know what the rule of thumb is on other technical oriented wikis..... Does anyone have any references?--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 16:04, 16 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
Minor edit: Fixed link to time resolution info on Frank Klemm's Musepack site (disappeared) to refer to hydrogenaudio's mirror. Will be searching for other links in the Wiki to fix them in the same way | |||
--[[User:Dynamic|Dynamic]] 14:21, 19 January 2007 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 20:21, 19 January 2007
Page discussion
is there any summary of a good quality / space compromise for using lame encoder?
The section Technical information needs a lot of work. Apparently there was someone interested in the past in maintaining it.--Beto 15:29, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
This is a whackingly big page --pepoluan 18:15, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
It might be a good idea to move the technical info down last on the page. I imagine that very few poeple need to read it and it really looks frightening.
Jan 04:41, 16 September 2006 (CDT)
- Maybe it would be better to put it right before the 'See also' section? What about creating a specific MP3 technical page to put this information? I really don't know what the rule of thumb is on other technical oriented wikis..... Does anyone have any references?--Beto 16:04, 16 September 2006 (CDT)
Minor edit: Fixed link to time resolution info on Frank Klemm's Musepack site (disappeared) to refer to hydrogenaudio's mirror. Will be searching for other links in the Wiki to fix them in the same way --Dynamic 14:21, 19 January 2007 (CST)