Talk:Rubyripper: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(Yes 3 erroneous bytes can be heard) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
@HotShotGG: I really appreciate the work you're doing. As English is not my native language and my time is limited, I naturally make (hopefully small) mistakes. Your latest changes seem to be an improvement as well. I didn't realize that a personal viewpoint of writing isn't all that professional ;) --[[User:Frodoontop|Frodoontop]] 16:48 01 Nov 2006 (CDT) | @HotShotGG: I really appreciate the work you're doing. As English is not my native language and my time is limited, I naturally make (hopefully small) mistakes. Your latest changes seem to be an improvement as well. I didn't realize that a personal viewpoint of writing isn't all that professional ;) --[[User:Frodoontop|Frodoontop]] 16:48 01 Nov 2006 (CDT) | ||
Don't worry about it that's why I am here and I enjoy writing. In a technical sense it is when your communicating a message. If were anything else it wouldn't matter. --[[User:HotshotGG|HotshotGG]] 18:01 01 Nov 2006 (CDT) | Don't worry about it that's why I am here and I enjoy writing. In a technical sense it is when your communicating a message. If it were anything else it wouldn't matter. --[[User:HotshotGG|HotshotGG]] 18:01 01 Nov 2006 (CDT) | ||
:One has to wonder though: can 3 bytes actually be heard in a wav file that produces 180.000 bytes per second? | |||
Yes, they can be heard. Take a file without lots of high-frequency harmonics and put a 0x7FFF or 0x8000 sample in and it will be a very audible pop. [[Special:Contributions/70.124.88.175|70.124.88.175]] 02:53, 18 October 2013 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 00:53, 18 October 2013
Copyediting
@HotShotGG: I really appreciate the work you're doing. As English is not my native language and my time is limited, I naturally make (hopefully small) mistakes. Your latest changes seem to be an improvement as well. I didn't realize that a personal viewpoint of writing isn't all that professional ;) --Frodoontop 16:48 01 Nov 2006 (CDT)
Don't worry about it that's why I am here and I enjoy writing. In a technical sense it is when your communicating a message. If it were anything else it wouldn't matter. --HotshotGG 18:01 01 Nov 2006 (CDT)
- One has to wonder though: can 3 bytes actually be heard in a wav file that produces 180.000 bytes per second?
Yes, they can be heard. Take a file without lots of high-frequency harmonics and put a 0x7FFF or 0x8000 sample in and it will be a very audible pop. 70.124.88.175 02:53, 18 October 2013 (CEST)