Talk:Replay Gain: Difference between revisions

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
VisualWikitext
(Wrong category?)
 
m (Talk:Replaygain moved to Talk:Replay Gain: official spelling)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


Why is this in "Signal Processing" category? Shouldn't it be in "Technical" category instead? --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 15:39, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
Why is this in "Signal Processing" category? Shouldn't it be in "Technical" category instead? --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 15:39, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
:IMO it could be in either. RG is also a kind of signal processing to determine loudness.--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 15:51, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
::Makes sense. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 18:10, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
:::Maybe to avoid confusion this page should be placed in both categories.....--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 16:07, 16 September 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 14:21, 13 June 2007

This is the talk page for discussing changes to the Replay Gain article.

  • Please do not use it as a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. Use the forums instead.
  • Please read the wiki policy before editing.
  • Sign and date your posts using two dashes and four tildes (--~~~~).
  • Place new comments after existing ones (but within topic sections).
  • Separate topic sections with a ==Descriptive header==.
  • Feel free to use these smilies by embedding their codes:
    {{smiley|)}} {{smiley|D}} {{smiley|(}} {{smiley|;}}

Page Discussion

Why is this in "Signal Processing" category? Shouldn't it be in "Technical" category instead? --pepoluan 15:39, 15 September 2006 (CDT)

IMO it could be in either. RG is also a kind of signal processing to determine loudness.--Beto 15:51, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
Makes sense. --pepoluan 18:10, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
Maybe to avoid confusion this page should be placed in both categories.....--Beto 16:07, 16 September 2006 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Talk:Replay_Gain&oldid=17129"