Talk:Bandpass filter: Difference between revisions
(BPF a DSP? Not really...) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Page Discussion== | ==Page Discussion== | ||
Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT) | Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
: maybe <nowiki>[[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]]</nowiki> would be better?--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 19:11, 10 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
:: Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
::: I guess you're right. Signal Processing sounds better because it encompassess analog as well.--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 11:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:29, 11 September 2006
Page Discussion
Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --pepoluan 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)
- maybe [[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]] would be better?--Beto 19:11, 10 September 2006 (CDT)
- Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --pepoluan 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- I guess you're right. Signal Processing sounds better because it encompassess analog as well.--Beto 11:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)