Difference between revisions of "Talk:Joint stereo"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Page discussion)
(Page discussion)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Page discussion==
 
==Page discussion==
 
Beto, if that's a *major* correction, why do you mark it as a minor update? Heh, sorry for nitpicking :-) --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 16:20, 1 September 2006 (CDT)
 
Beto, if that's a *major* correction, why do you mark it as a minor update? Heh, sorry for nitpicking :-) --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 16:20, 1 September 2006 (CDT)
: been away for some time. I didn't even noticed it was marked as minor update... It sure wasn't :-D
+
: been away for some time. I didn't even noticed it was marked as minor update... It sure wasn't :-D --[[User:Beto|Beto]] <small>'''([[User_talk:Beto|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Beto|contribs]])'''</small> 18:46, 30 November 2006 (CST)
  
 
==General Cleanup & Warning Notes==
 
==General Cleanup & Warning Notes==

Revision as of 01:46, 1 December 2006

This is the talk page for discussing changes to the Joint stereo article.

  • Please do not use it as a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. Use the forums instead.
  • Please read the wiki policy before editing.
  • Sign and date your posts using two dashes and four tildes (--~~~~).
  • Place new comments after existing ones (but within topic sections).
  • Separate topic sections with a ==Descriptive header==.
  • Feel free to use these smilies by embedding their codes:
    Smiley--).png {{smiley|)}} Smiley--D.png {{smiley|D}} Smiley--(.png {{smiley|(}} Smiley--;.png {{smiley|;}}

Page discussion

Beto, if that's a *major* correction, why do you mark it as a minor update? Heh, sorry for nitpicking :-) --pepoluan 16:20, 1 September 2006 (CDT)

been away for some time. I didn't even noticed it was marked as minor update... It sure wasn't :-D --Beto (talk | contribs) 18:46, 30 November 2006 (CST)

General Cleanup & Warning Notes

1. The "Additional Information" section needs cleanup.

2. The external link "written by user - High Quality Audio guides" -- it still touts MPC as the best-quality encoder, while we all know that it is no longer the case. But the recommendations on tools and procedures are quite on-the-spot. So I suggest putting a warning in the ilk: Note: Despite this page's recommendation for MPC, please be aware that in recent listening tests, other encodings are also proven to be at least as good as MPC.

--pepoluan (talk | contribs) 14:18, 30 November 2006 (CST)