Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bandpass filter"

From Hydrogenaudio Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Page Discussion)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
:: Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
 
:: Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --[[User:Pepoluan|pepoluan]] 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
 +
 +
::: I guess you're right. Signal Processing sounds better because it encompassess analog as well.--[[User:Beto|Beto]] 11:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 16:29, 11 September 2006

This is the talk page for discussing changes to the Bandpass filter article.

  • Please do not use it as a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. Use the forums instead.
  • Please read the wiki policy before editing.
  • Sign and date your posts using two dashes and four tildes (--~~~~).
  • Place new comments after existing ones (but within topic sections).
  • Separate topic sections with a ==Descriptive header==.
  • Feel free to use these smilies by embedding their codes:
    Smiley--).png {{smiley|)}} Smiley--D.png {{smiley|D}} Smiley--(.png {{smiley|(}} Smiley--;.png {{smiley|;}}

Page Discussion

Come to think of it, this definition is not only in the digital domain; it is applicable generally even to analogue BPF's. I think grouping it under "Digital Signal Processing" is not right. --pepoluan 02:23, 9 September 2006 (CDT)

maybe [[Category:Technical]][[Category:Filters]] would be better?--Beto 19:11, 10 September 2006 (CDT)
Doesn't making a "FIlters" category makes the category too thin? What if just "Signal Processing" instead of "Digital Signal Processing" ? --pepoluan 09:34, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
I guess you're right. Signal Processing sounds better because it encompassess analog as well.--Beto 11:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)